Contact an injury attorney Bruce Bierhans - covering all of southeast Massachusetts for victims of accidents, negligence and dangerous products. http://capecod.injuryboard.com/all-topics/recent-comments/ Very good advice at a time that people really need it. http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-malpractice/some-helpful-hints-to-avoid-long-er-waits.aspx?googleid=265714#C23668 A comment on Some Helpful Hints to Avoid Long ER Waits Medical Malpractice long ER waits emergency room care advocating for patients patients rights emergency room waits Mike Bryant Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:06:37 GMT My 16 year old died two years ago from a recalled Medtronic pacemaker that had loose wires. And now because of the Supreme Court it will be extremely difficult to ever get a discovery ordered to even determine if there were manufacture defects.<br /><br />Big government once again interferring with my individual rights to sue. http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-meeting-held-to-address-complaints-about-the-medical-device-approval-process.aspx?googleid=261848#C23410 A comment on FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process Medical Devices & Implants medical devices surgical devices medical implants Food and Drug Administration FDA surgical mistake faulty device Mark Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:30:29 GMT Very good information, it is sad to find so many people that get the coverage they need only after they learn how much they really needed it. http://capecod.injuryboard.com/automobile-accidents/managed-competition-and-your-liability-coverage.aspx?googleid=263888#C21760 A comment on Managed Competition and Your Liability Coverage Automobile Accidents motor vehicle accidents; personal injury in massachusetts; motor vehicle insurance; wrongful death Mike Bryant Sun, 31 May 2009 18:30:12 GMT The whole modification situation is a mess in my opinion. I really think the President is on the right track, but the banks need to be on board. The banks, mortgage lenders etc. have to see the bigger picture for the economy and their own business. If you got to the making home affordable site you can see that not many servicers have signed up.<br /><br />I believe the transparency of this administration is much better and you can go to websites and see detailed info on the mortgage modification plan. However some info is still confusing to the average consumer. <br /><br />I have followed your posts on Massachusetts predatory lending. I hope you post more, but I am sure you are probably so busy these days with clients. http://capecod.injuryboard.com/miscellaneous/dear-president-obamapart-ii-what-mortgage-program.aspx?googleid=259118#C20642 A comment on Dear President Obama/Part II/ What Mortgage Program? Miscellaneous Massachusetts loan Modifications; Mortgage Workouts; Predatory lending shannon Tue, 12 May 2009 10:43:54 GMT My defib also failed but it was when I coded. The manufacturer [St judes medical] St Judes knew that the defibrillator was turned off due to a malfunction and left it inside me, I can prove it but what can I do?? http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-meeting-held-to-address-complaints-about-the-medical-device-approval-process.aspx?googleid=261848#C20598 A comment on FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process Medical Devices & Implants medical devices surgical devices medical implants Food and Drug Administration FDA surgical mistake faulty device Kirby Nolan Knight Mon, 11 May 2009 18:57:48 GMT dksla;dk, I don’t normally slam people, because everyone is entitled to their opinion, but...<br /><br />I must agree with Tony on this one. You are an idiot. As a person who has been injured by a 510K approved medical device, and being used unbeknownst to me as the manufacturer’s clinical trial or guinea pig, I can honestly say that more stringent guidelines are a necessity, and that by having these guidelines in place, it will provide the public greater safety.<br /><br />We want higher regulation of these devices, which in turn will lead to lower litigation levels. <br /><br />That being said, those of us who have already sustained injuries have every right to be compensated for the mutilation done to our bodies. We are living with physical pain and mental anguish, and we have been harmed fiscally as well. I should not be held responsible for surgeries I never should have had to endure, and had these devices been approved under more stringent guidelines, and had I been made aware of the adverse events that were on file before my doctor implanted the mesh device, I would never have allowed this to be implanted in my body. <br /><br />Believe me, my husband and I have paid dearly (physically, emotionally and fiscally) for what was done to me, and the manufacturer needs to be held accountable for leaving this garbage on the market to harm me despite the fact that 664 adverse events were on file for Ethicon’s family of mesh products at the time it was implanted 2004. To this day, this garbage is still on the market, and the adverse events’ now number nearly thirteen hundred. The FDA is allowing more and more people to be harmed every day, and is creating a slew of new potential victims by their refusal to pull mesh devices from the market.<br /><br />Wake up fool! http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-meeting-held-to-address-complaints-about-the-medical-device-approval-process.aspx?googleid=261848#C20044 A comment on FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process Medical Devices & Implants medical devices surgical devices medical implants Food and Drug Administration FDA surgical mistake faulty device Suzanne McClain Tue, 05 May 2009 15:44:43 GMT dksla;dk, I don’t normally slam people, because everyone is entitled to their opinion, but...<br /><br />I must agree with Tony on this one. You are an idiot. As a person who has been injured by a 510K approved medical device, and being used unbeknownst to me as the manufacturer’s clinical trial or guinea pig, I can honestly say that more stringent guidelines are a necessity, and that by having these guidelines in place, it will provide the public greater safety.<br /><br />We want higher regulation of these devices, which in turn will lead to lower litigation levels. <br /><br />That being said, those of us who have already sustained injuries have every right to be compensated for the mutilation done to our bodies. We are living with physical pain and mental anguish, and we have been harmed fiscally as well. I should not be held responsible for surgeries I never should have had to endure, and had these devices been approved under more stringent guidelines, and had I been made aware of the adverse events that were on file before my doctor implanted the mesh device, I would never have allowed this to be implanted in my body. <br /><br />Believe me, my husband and I have paid dearly (physically, emotionally and fiscally) for what was done to me, and the manufacturer needs to be held accountable for leaving this garbage on the market to harm me despite the fact that 664 adverse events were on file for Ethicon’s family of mesh products at the time it was implanted 2004. To this day, this garbage is still on the market, and the adverse events’ now number nearly thirteen hundred. The FDA is allowing more and more people to be harmed every day, and is creating a slew of new potential victims by their refusal to pull mesh devices from the market.<br /><br />Wake up fool! http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-meeting-held-to-address-complaints-about-the-medical-device-approval-process.aspx?googleid=261848#C20042 A comment on FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process Medical Devices & Implants medical devices surgical devices medical implants Food and Drug Administration FDA surgical mistake faulty device Suzanne McClain Tue, 05 May 2009 15:44:27 GMT your an idiot! http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-meeting-held-to-address-complaints-about-the-medical-device-approval-process.aspx?googleid=261848#C20032 A comment on FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process Medical Devices & Implants medical devices surgical devices medical implants Food and Drug Administration FDA surgical mistake faulty device Tony Tue, 05 May 2009 14:46:48 GMT Oh, and corporate lobbyists are just HORRIBLE. Trial lawyers don't lobby. No. Never. http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-meeting-held-to-address-complaints-about-the-medical-device-approval-process.aspx?googleid=261848#C19554 A comment on FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process Medical Devices & Implants medical devices surgical devices medical implants Food and Drug Administration FDA surgical mistake faulty device dksla;dk Tue, 28 Apr 2009 06:13:51 GMT You'd love that, wouldn't you? Greater safety? Sure. That's what you want. Bulls*@t. You would much prefer low regulation, high litigation as opposed to high regulation low litigation. http://capecod.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/fda-meeting-held-to-address-complaints-about-the-medical-device-approval-process.aspx?googleid=261848#C19552 A comment on FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process Medical Devices & Implants medical devices surgical devices medical implants Food and Drug Administration FDA surgical mistake faulty device dksla;dk Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:57:32 GMT