FDA Meeting Held to Address Complaints About the Medical Device Approval Process

Carrie Strasser
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 541
Posted by Carrie StrasserApril 27, 2009 2:44 PM

The New York Times reported last week that a rare internal meeting was held by the FDA on Wednesday to address the complaints surrounding the medical device approval process.

Dr. Donna-Bea Tillman, director of the agency’s office of device evaluation, sent an e-mail message on April 10 announcing an “all-hands meeting” to discuss the strategic direction of the device center. Such a broad-based meeting that includes all scientists within the device evaluation office has not been held for years, two agency officials said.

This meeting was spurred by letters to President Obama signed by nine scientists alleging that agency officials had acted improperly and put patients at risk by approving medical devices for use in spite of numerous objections from scientists reviewing the devices.

These letters have led to the opening of a Congressional investigation and a critical report of the device center released by the Government Accountability Office in January. Additionally, Congress is to propose legislation this week asking the Institute of Medicine to investigate the device division.

Specific devices that the scientists complained about were imaging equipment used to detect breast cancer and an orthopedic knee device. The scientists also charged that the agency has allowed hospitals to clean and reuse certain devices intended for only one use.

This meeting will hopefully be the first step toward greater concern for patient safety when it comes to medical devices. As of now, many patients harmed by certain medical devices have no recourse through the judicial system. However, if the approval process becomes more rigid, this could prevent avoidable injuries due to faulty medical devices. For more information on medical devices, click here.

8 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

JILL PAUL RN
Posted by JILL PAUL RN
April 27, 2009 7:03 PM

If you, or a loved one, has been injured by a faulty medical device or drug, please sign and post comments on the ongoing petition to support the Medical Device Safety Act 2009-S540/HR 1346 at:
More ...

Together, we can stand against the big corporate lobbyists who do not want this very important piece of Legislature passed in Congress and The Senate. This bill, if passed, will negate FDA Preemption and restore our legal rights as United States citizens. Please sign this for you, your Children, and your Grandchildren and protect the innocent victims of faulty medical devices' and drugs. Thank you for joining us in our effort for bringing this to The Congress and The Senate's attention in asking for their support in passing this urgent piece of legislation. Together we can conquer, alone, we cannot.

dksla;dk
Posted by dksla;dk
April 28, 2009 5:57 AM

You'd love that, wouldn't you? Greater safety? Sure. That's what you want. Bulls*@t. You would much prefer low regulation, high litigation as opposed to high regulation low litigation.

dksla;dk
Posted by dksla;dk
April 28, 2009 6:13 AM

Oh, and corporate lobbyists are just HORRIBLE. Trial lawyers don't lobby. No. Never.

Tony
Posted by Tony
May 05, 2009 2:46 PM

your an idiot!

Suzanne McClain
Posted by Suzanne McClain
May 05, 2009 3:44 PM

dksla;dk, I don’t normally slam people, because everyone is entitled to their opinion, but...

I must agree with Tony on this one. You are an idiot. As a person who has been injured by a 510K approved medical device, and being used unbeknownst to me as the manufacturer’s clinical trial or guinea pig, I can honestly say that more stringent guidelines are a necessity, and that by having these guidelines in place, it will provide the public greater safety.

We want higher regulation of these devices, which in turn will lead to lower litigation levels.

That being said, those of us who have already sustained injuries have every right to be compensated for the mutilation done to our bodies. We are living with physical pain and mental anguish, and we have been harmed fiscally as well. I should not be held responsible for surgeries I never should have had to endure, and had these devices been approved under more stringent guidelines, and had I been made aware of the adverse events that were on file before my doctor implanted the mesh device, I would never have allowed this to be implanted in my body.

Believe me, my husband and I have paid dearly (physically, emotionally and fiscally) for what was done to me, and the manufacturer needs to be held accountable for leaving this garbage on the market to harm me despite the fact that 664 adverse events were on file for Ethicon’s family of mesh products at the time it was implanted 2004. To this day, this garbage is still on the market, and the adverse events’ now number nearly thirteen hundred. The FDA is allowing more and more people to be harmed every day, and is creating a slew of new potential victims by their refusal to pull mesh devices from the market.

Wake up fool!

Suzanne McClain
Posted by Suzanne McClain
May 05, 2009 3:44 PM

dksla;dk, I don’t normally slam people, because everyone is entitled to their opinion, but...

I must agree with Tony on this one. You are an idiot. As a person who has been injured by a 510K approved medical device, and being used unbeknownst to me as the manufacturer’s clinical trial or guinea pig, I can honestly say that more stringent guidelines are a necessity, and that by having these guidelines in place, it will provide the public greater safety.

We want higher regulation of these devices, which in turn will lead to lower litigation levels.

That being said, those of us who have already sustained injuries have every right to be compensated for the mutilation done to our bodies. We are living with physical pain and mental anguish, and we have been harmed fiscally as well. I should not be held responsible for surgeries I never should have had to endure, and had these devices been approved under more stringent guidelines, and had I been made aware of the adverse events that were on file before my doctor implanted the mesh device, I would never have allowed this to be implanted in my body.

Believe me, my husband and I have paid dearly (physically, emotionally and fiscally) for what was done to me, and the manufacturer needs to be held accountable for leaving this garbage on the market to harm me despite the fact that 664 adverse events were on file for Ethicon’s family of mesh products at the time it was implanted 2004. To this day, this garbage is still on the market, and the adverse events’ now number nearly thirteen hundred. The FDA is allowing more and more people to be harmed every day, and is creating a slew of new potential victims by their refusal to pull mesh devices from the market.

Wake up fool!

Kirby Nolan Knight
Posted by Kirby Nolan Knight
May 11, 2009 6:57 PM

My defib also failed but it was when I coded. The manufacturer [St judes medical] St Judes knew that the defibrillator was turned off due to a malfunction and left it inside me, I can prove it but what can I do??

Mark
Posted by Mark
June 23, 2009 11:30 PM

My 16 year old died two years ago from a recalled Medtronic pacemaker that had loose wires. And now because of the Supreme Court it will be extremely difficult to ever get a discovery ordered to even determine if there were manufacture defects.

Big government once again interferring with my individual rights to sue.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Cape Cod

InjuryBoard Cape Cod RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Cape Cod is brought to you by Law Offices of Bruce A. Bierhans, LLC

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Law Offices of Bruce A. Bierhans, LLC 866-735-1102 Ext. 540 www.bierlaw.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: All of Cape Cod and Southeastern Masssachusetts: Bristol County, Brockton, Canton, Eastern Center, Franklin, Norfolk County, Plymouth, Plymouth County, Stoughton, Wareham, Bridgewater, Avon, Bridgewater, Cape Cod, Chatham, Eastham, Falmouth, Hyannis, Mansfield, Middleboro, Orleans, Sandwich, Sharon, Wellfleet
868 Washington Street, Easton, Massachusetts 02375 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address